Legal Opinion

United States v. Santana-Gomez

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 11, 2013No. 19-1331UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

MICHAEL R. MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

I. Introduction

Defendant-Appellant Cesar Santana-Gomez was charged in a one-count indictment with possession with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine. He moved to suppress evidence obtained from the search of his Chevrolet Malibu, arguing the initial traffic stop was not supported by reasonable articulable suspicion and the subsequent encounter was not consensual. After the district court denied Santana-Gomez’s motion, he entered into a conditional guilty plea with the government. The court thereafter sentenced him to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. United States v. HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Cline, TimothyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Santana-Gomez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API