United States v. Hauk
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant John Stevens Hauk appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence discovered as a result of a protective sweep of his residence. Mr. Hauk argues that the police lacked reasonable suspicion for the protective sweep because it was based on uncorroborated information in an anonymous tip. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we AFFIRM the district court’s denial of Mr. Hauk’s motion to suppress. However, on plain error review, we conclude that Mr. Hauk’s sentence violated his Sixth Amendment rights under United States…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Couture Ex Rel. M.C. v. Board of Education of the Albuquerque Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Carrizales-ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. WardellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. McHughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Victor Manuel Torres-CastroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.