Legal Opinion
Roger W. Crooker v. Sexton Motors, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 2, 1972No. 72-1183PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.
Roger W. Crooker brought this action against his former employer, Sexton Motors, Inc. (Sexton), to recover unpaid overtime compensation for services rendered to Sexton. Crooker asserted district court jurisdiction under section 7(a)(1) and 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (Act), 29 U.S.C. §§ 207(a)(1) and 216(b). 1 Sexton defended on the ground that it was exempt from the provisions of 29 U.S.C. § 207, pertaining to maximum hours, by reason of the transportation exemption contained in section 13(b) (1) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 213(b)(1). 2
The parties stipulated that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Levinson v. Spector Motor ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Morris v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Pyramid Motor Freight Corp. v. IspassSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Wirtz v. C & P Shoe Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Coleman v. Jiffy June Farms, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Thomas v. Wichita Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Irobe v. US Dept. of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- Friedrich v. U.S. Computer ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Gomez v. Lincare, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Kenneth Troutt v. Stavola Brothers, Incorporated, D/B/A Stavola Brothers RacingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.