Legal Opinion
Wirtz v. C & P Shoe Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 20, 1964No. 20813PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOTLE, District Judge.
These appeals present for the second time, five consolidated actions brought by the Secretary of Labor under Section 16(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(c) pursuant to the written request of thirty-three (33) employees of C & P Shoe Corporation to recover unpaid minimum wages and overtime compensation. On the former appearance of these cases before this Court, it was held that the entry of the shoes into defendant’s warehouse did not terminate their interstate journey, but constituted only a temporary pause for con*24venience in the process of getting…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Walling v. General Industries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Morris v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Anand Prakash v. American UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- John T. Blankenship, Gerald Wayne Hodges and Virgil Olen McDonald v. Thurston Motor Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
- Thomas v. County of Fairfax, Va.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
- Roger W. Crooker v. Sexton Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.