Legal Opinion

Matovich v. Gradich Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1936No. Appeal, 86PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The proceeding below was an amicable action in ejectment to recover possession of a house and bakery shop erected on four lots in the Borough of Trafford, Westmoreland County, together with certain trade fixtures installed in the bakery. The action was instituted, and judgments therein entered against the defendants, by virtue of warrants of attorney contained in a lease of the premises for a term of three years from January 1, 1934, made by the plaintiff, George Matovich, as lessor, to the defendants, Frank Gradich and Katherine Gradich, as lessees.

By this appeal we…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Bank v. FulmorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. Charles D. Kaier Co. v. O'brienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  4. Augustine v. WolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Grakelow v. KidderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Corestates Bank, N.A. v. CutilloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Homart Development Co. v. SgrenciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Peirce v. HoffstotSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Pops Pce TT, LP v. R&R Rest. Grp., LLC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Markeim-Chalmers-Ludington, Inc. v. MeadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API