Young's Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 165, Oct. T., 1911, by Mary Emma Vincent, Administratrix, from decree of O. C. Allegheny Co., Nov. T., 1910, No. 141, dismissing exceptions to adjudication in Estate of Parthenia Young, deceased. Exceptions to adjudication. Before Hawkins, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned among others was in dismissing exceptions to the adjudication.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Stewart,
The note which gives rise to this controversy was the last of series of renewals, all of like tenor, with the same maker and endorser on each. The maker was a married woman; the endorser, a single woman, who has since died. It is against the estate of the latter, now in process of distribution, that demand is made for payment of the note. The transaction had its origin back in October 1903, when the East End Savings and Trust Company, appellee, discounted a note drawn by Emma Vincent payable to the order of Reed M. Vincent, and by the latter endorsed, for $2,000,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Erwin v. . DownsNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Binney v. Globe National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Rathfon v. LocherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Leonard v. DuffinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
3Cited by9 opinions
- Newtown T. T. Co. v. Underw'd (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Deposit National Bank v. Beaver Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- In re Lance Lumber Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1915
- Marshall v. MarshallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Judge v. West Philadelphia Title & Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.