Legal Opinion

Kuehn v. Stanley

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 7, 2004No. 2 CA-CV 2003-0136PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, J.

¶ 1 Appellants Ernest and Jo Ann Kuehn appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment and award of attorney fees in favor of appellees Theresa Stanley and First Mag-nus Corporation on the Kuehns’ claims of negligence, consumer fraud, negligent supervision, and breach of contract. The Kuehns contend that issues of law and material fact exist precluding summary judgment and that the trial court abused its discretion when it granted attorney fees to First Magnus as a prevailing party to a contract claim. Finding no error or abuse of discretion, we affirm.

¶ 2 Although the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/GillelandArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Standard Chartered PLC v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Argabright v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
  2. Sheet Metal Workers Local 441 Health & Welfare Plan v. Glaxosmithkline, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Amanda Watts v. Medicis Pharmaceutical CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Hourani v. Benson HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. In Re Flonase Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API