Legal Opinion
Baut v. Pethick Construction Company
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 21, 1966No. Civ. 8169PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND OPINION
SHERIDAN, Chief Judge.
This is an action for patent infringement, unfair competition, and wrongful appropriation of property rights in connection with a stained glass window, which was installed in the Forty Fort Presbyterian Church, Forty Fort, Pennsylvania.
Plaintiffs, Eugene R. Baut and Harry S. Baut, are the holders of United States Letters Patent 3,064,380 for an invention which generally relates to a type of stained glass construction called “art glass” panel construction, and more particularly, to a metal art glass panel. Defendant, Pethick…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Smith v. SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McGhan v. EbersolDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Duffy v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Uni-Sys., LLC v. U.S. Tennis Ass'n, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Huck v. Gabriel RealtyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Murray v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.