United States v. Universal Management Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.
Defendants appeal summary judgment for plaintiff and a permanent injunction from the manufacture and sale of a device intended to reheve certain types of physical pain when applied to acupressure points. We AFFIRM.
The court of appeals reviews an order granting summary judgment de novo, and hence uses the same test as used in the district court. See Terry Barr Sales Agency, Inc. v. All-Lock Co., 96 F.3d 174, 178 (6th Cir.1996). Summary judgment is proper “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits,…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States ex rel. Modglin v. DJO Global Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Federal Trade Commission v. QT, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- United States ex rel. Modglin v. DJO Global Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- United States v. Universal Management Services, Inc., Corporation Natural Choice, Inc. Corporation, Doing Business as Natural Choice Products, Inc. Paul M. Monea, Individual Paul A. MoneaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. KaminskiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.