Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Modglin v. DJO Global Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided May 8, 2015No. Case No. CV 12-07152 MMM (JCGx)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE CORRECTED THIRD AMENDED COM- ■ PLAINT ■ '
MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.
Qui tam relators Doris Modglin and Russ Milko filed this action against defendants bjO Global Inc. (“DJO Global”), DJO, LLC (“DJO”), DJO Finance LLC (“DJO Finance”), Orthofix, Inc. (“Ortho-fix”), Biomet, Inc. (“Biomet”), and EBI, LP (“EBI”) under seal and in camera on August'20, 2012. Relators invoked the court’s federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and alleged a single claim for violation of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1)(A),…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Groat v. Boston Heart Diagnostics Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States ex rel. Bierman v. Orthofix International, N.V.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Anne Palamides v. Silverado Senior Living, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2021
- Barbara Lebow v. Silverado Senior Living, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2021
- Bostwick v. SN Servicing CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.