Legal Opinion

Phoenix Petroleum Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 11, 1998No. 97-315CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARGOLIS, Judge.

This government contracts action is before the court on defendant’s motion .to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. Plaintiff contends that it is entitled to quantum meruit recovery because a provision of its jet fuel contract with the United States allegedly violates § 16.203 of the Federal Acquisition Regulations (“FAR”). Defendant argues that the court should dismiss plaintiffs quantum meruit claim or grant summary judgment in defendant’s favor because (1) plaintiff lacks standing to bring the claim, (2) plaintiff waived its right to bring the claim,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Nevada v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. The Young Engineers, Inc., (Aka Tye or Tye, Inc.,) v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. Rosenshein v. KlebanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  5. Walter G. Finch v. Hughes Aircraft CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  2. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  3. La Gloria Oil & Gas Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  4. Florida Power & Light Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  5. Doninger Metal Products, Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API