Legal Opinion

Holland v. City of St. Louis

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 9, 1953No. 43710PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

262 S.W.2d 1 (1953)

HOLLAND et al.

v.

CITY OF ST. LOUIS.

No. 43710.

Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 2.

November 9, 1953.

Kenneth Teasdale, St. Louis, Cobbs, Blake, Armstrong, Teasdale & Roos and Charles E. Dapron, Jr., St. Louis, of counsel, for appellants.

Albert Miller, St. Louis, for respondent.

BOHLING, Commissioner.

The members of the Civil Service Commission of the City of St. Louis, in their official capacity, instituted this action against the City of St. Louis for a declaratory judgment as to whether they have authority under Article XVIII of the City Charter to recommend a salary for…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. Butler Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. City of Springfield v. ClouseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  3. Gerber v. Schutte Investment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  4. Higgins v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  5. City of St. Louis v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hilderbrand v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Sanderson v. RichardsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. City of St. Louis v. StensonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. City of Olivette v. GraelerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API