Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis v. Stenson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1960No. 29586PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDDY, Judge.

Defendant was charged in the City Court of St. Louis with violation of Ordinance No. 47067 of said City. The record before us does not show the ruling made in the City Court of St: Louis. However, it is obvious an appeal was taken to the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction by the party who suffered an adverse decision in said City Court.

In the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction the defendant was found guilty and a fine of $25 was assessed against him, from which judgment he has appealed. The appeal is submitted here on an “agreed statement of facts in lieu of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. Butler Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. State v. KempSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. State v. BrookshireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. State Ex Rel. Hewlett v. WomachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  5. State Ex Rel. Rothrum v. DarbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sheets v. ThomannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. State Ex Rel. Patterson v. TuckerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Stine v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Poff v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  5. University City v. Diveley Auto Body CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API