Bickelman v. Herrill Bowling Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*579The appeals from the orders must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeals from the orders are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
Generally, a snow removal contractor’s contractual obligation, standing alone, will not give rise to tort liability in favor of third parties unless: (1) the snow removal contractor, in failing to exercise reasonable care in the performance of its…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Espinal v. Melville Snow Contractors, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Brill v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Grande v. PeteroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Podlaski v. Long Island Paneling Center of Centereach, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Medina v. R.M. ResourcesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Teitelbaum v. Crown Heights Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re HeinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Lehman v. North Greenwich Landscaping, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.