Legal Opinion
In re Heino
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 18, 2010PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a probate proceeding in which Harvey Heino, a co-executor of the estate of Andre Heino, petitioned to judicially settle the account of the estate, the objectant Jay Heino appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County (Torres, S.), dated December 3, 2008, which granted the petitioner’s motion for summary judgment dismissing certain objections to the account, and denied as untimely his cross motion for summary judgment.
Ordered that, the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof granting that branch of the petitioner’s motion which was for summary…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Brill v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Miceli v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- In Re the Estate of DonnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Estate of McAlpineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Estate of TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re CraneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re CraneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012