Legal Opinion

Medina v. R.M. Resources

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 19, 2013No. Appeal No. 1; Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants R.M. Resources, Costco Wholesale Corporation, Ruland-110 Associates, L.E, MS Venture Corp., Better Ruland Road Associates, L.E, and Best Ruland, Inc., appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, Jr., J.), dated October 17, 2011, as denied that branch of their cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and granted the motion of the defendant Ingersoll-Rand Company for summary judgment dismissing…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Brill v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Ortega v. PucciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Miceli v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Allan v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Abdou v. RampaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. Cando v. Ajay Gen. Contr. Co. Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. Bennett v. HuckeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Vazquez v. Humboldt Seigle Lofts, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. Fucci v. PlotkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API