Legal Opinion
In Re Meek
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho
Decided June 27, 2007No. 06-20307PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
TERRY L. MYERS, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this case, the chapter 13 debtors, the chapter 13 trustee and the U.S. Trustee 1 disagree on how several provisions of the Bankruptcy Code as amended by the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, Pub.L. No. 109-8, 119 Stat. 23 (2005) (“BAPCPA”) should be interpreted and applied. In particular, in the context of confirmation of the debtors’ proposed chapter 13 plan, they disagree on how “projected disposable income” for “above median income” chapter 13 debtors should be calculated. The matter was framed…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Union Bank v. WolasSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Negonsott v. SamuelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb, Debtors. In Re Julian Roosevelt Goeb and Jane Alma Goeb v. Harry W. Heid, Chapter 13 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc. v. NighSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- In Re HardacreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Pak v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Pak)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- In Re CrinkUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2009
- In Re SpurgeonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2007
- In Re LivermanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- In Re WilsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.