Legal Opinion
Diamond 67, LLC v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 5, 2011No. AC 31913PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALVORD, J.
This appeal arises from a judgment rendered in accordance with a settlement agreement in which the plaintiff, Diamond 67, LLC; the intervening plaintiff, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.; 1 and the defendant, the planning and zoning commission of the town of Vernon, settled this mandamus action pertaining to the plaintiffs site plan application. Glenn Montigny, an environmental intervenor pursuant to General Statutes § 22a-19, 2 claims that on remand from this court, the trial court (1) improperly denied his request for a continuance, (2) misinterpreted our remand order in Diamond 67,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- D'ERAMO v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Hurley v. Heart Physicians, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Brookridge District Ass'n v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Higgins v. KarpSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Avalonbay Communities, Inc. v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Diamond 67, LLC v. OatisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Burgos-Torres v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Batchelder v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Diamond 67, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011