Sikhs for Justice "SFJ", Inc. v. Facebook, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE AND FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS
LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Sikhs for Justice Inc. alleges that Defendant Facebook, Inc. violated *1090federal and state law by blocking access to ■Plaintiffs Facebook page (the “SFJ Page”) in India. ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”). Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss. ECF No. 18. Defendant also moves to strike Plaintiffs state law claims and for attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16, California’s…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Caraccioli v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Cross v. Facebook, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- La'Tiejira v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
- Abrera v. NewsomDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Callahan v. Ancestry.com Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.