Legal Opinion

Sikhs for Justice "SFJ", Inc. v. Facebook, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 13, 2015No. Case No. 15-CV-02442-LHKPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE AND FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS

LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Sikhs for Justice Inc. alleges that Defendant Facebook, Inc. violated *1090federal and state law by blocking access to ■Plaintiffs Facebook page (the “SFJ Page”) in India. ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”). Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss. ECF No. 18. Defendant also moves to strike Plaintiffs state law claims and for attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16, California’s…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Caraccioli v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
  2. Cross v. Facebook, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. La'Tiejira v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
  4. Abrera v. NewsomDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. Callahan v. Ancestry.com Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API