Legal Opinion

Sou. Silica Mining Mfg. Co. v. Hoefer

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 27, 1949No. 16269Published

1Opinion of the Court

Decree of Judge G. Duncan Bellinger follows:

In October 1948, the Southern Silica Mining and Manufacturing Company instituted this action for the purpose of determining the rights of the plaintiff and of the defendant under two contracts made between the plaintiff and the late F. Augustus Hoefer, on the 1st day of March, 1928, and the second on the 1st day of November, 1943, and for appropriate relief for the breach of the two contracts.

Motions to strike, to make more definite and certain and to require election were disposed of in my order of December 31, 1948.

Defendant's answer and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Witt v. PooleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  2. Pope v. GoetheSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  3. Hutto v. WigginsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  4. Rice v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  5. Boykin v. CapehartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API