Legal Opinion

Boykin v. Capehart

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 3, 1944No. 15681PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court is satisfied, from a careful study of the questions presented by this appeal, that Judge Bellinger correctly disposed of all issues involved in the case. The decree of the Circuit Court, the order refusing a new trial, and the order confirming the survey and plat of the boundary line, set forth fully the history of the litigation. We are in accord with the reasoning and conclusions of Judge Bellinger in his decree and orders, and affirm the judgment of the lower Court.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Chiee Justice Baker and Messrs. Associate Justices Fishburne,-StukEs^ Tayeor, and Oxner concur.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shelley v. ShelleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  2. The STATE v. HarreldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  3. Fenzel v. FloydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Southern Silica Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. HoeferSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  5. In Re Estate of HymanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API