Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Franklin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 2002No. 2000-2004 & 2000-2141PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 95 Ohio St.3d 344.] HAYNES ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF FRANKLIN ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Haynes v. Franklin,

2002-Ohio-2334.] Municipal corporations—Streets and highways—Nuisance—Political subdivision tort liability—Edge drop at the berm of a road—Two-pronged test used to determine whether a condition in the right-of-way of a road should be deemed a nuisance for purposes of R.C. 2744.02(B)(3). (Nos. 2000-2004 and 2000-2141—Submitted December 12, 2001—Decided May 29, 2002.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Haverlack v. Portage Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Enghauser Manufacturing Co. v. Eriksson Engineering Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Franks v. LopezOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Stevens v. AckmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Garrett v. City of SanduskyOhio Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bonace v. Springfield TownshipOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Webb v. EdwardsOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Murray v. ChillicotheOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Davis v. AkronOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Lucchesi v. FischerOhio Court of Appeals · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API