Legal Opinion
Durst v. Tautges, Wilder & McDonald
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 10, 1930No. 4295PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPARKS, Circuit Judge.
Appellee is a firm of lawyers, resident in Minnesota. Robert McDonald of said firm came into Wisconsin on the 17th day of September, 1928, for the sole purpose of taking, on September 18, 19, and 20, depositions of witnesses residing in Wisconsin to be used in three actions pending in the courts of Minnesota, in which actions members of appellee were the attorneys of record. On the day he arrived McDonald and the witnesses whose depositions he had come to take were served, as defendants, with summons, complaint, and injunctional order in three separate actions commenced…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Stewart v. RamsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Person v. . GrierNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Matthews v. . TuftsNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Parker v. . MarcoNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Bridges v. SheldonUnited States Circuit Court · 1880
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State ex rel. Johnson v. Tautges, Rerat & WelchNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
- Hardie v. BrysonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1942
- Bardahl Manufacturing Corp. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
- Republic Productions, Inc. v. American Federation of MusiciansDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Spelbrink v. JacobsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.