Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Johnson v. Tautges, Rerat & Welch

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1945No. 31953PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.

This is an appeal from the ruling of the district court on two special appearances, objecting to the jurisdiction of the court. The respondents prevailed when the special appearances were sustained. From this ruling, the relator appeals.

On May 8, 1944, the relator filed his petition and named therein, among others, Tauges, (correct name Tautges) Rerat & Welch, a copartnership. The petition alleged that the respondents, William A. Tautges, Eugene A. Rerat and Walter J. Welch are each practicing attorneys engaged in the practice of law, maintaining their offices in Minneapolis, Minnesota, under…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Stewart v. RamsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Lamb v. SchmittSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Netograph Manufacturing Co. v. . ScrughamNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Parker v. . MarcoNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Cooney v. MoomawDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1953
  3. Williams v. Gould, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Hastings College v. ReesNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Conkling v. De LanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API