Legal Opinion

Hardie v. Bryson

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided April 7, 1942No. 1042PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

44 F.Supp. 67 (1942)

HARDIE

v.

BRYSON.

No. 1042.

District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.

April 7, 1942.

Lashly, Lashly, Miller & Clifford, of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.

William O'Herin, of St. Louis, Mo. (Leahy, Walther & Hecker, of St. Louis, Mo., of counsel), for defendant.

MOORE, District Judge.

This is an automobile negligence action in which James L. Hardie is plaintiff and Charles G. Bryson is defendant. The case was removed from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, jurisdiction in this Court being based on diversity of citizenship. An extremely interesting point of law is presented by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Stewart v. RamsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Lamb v. SchmittSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Baisley v. BaisleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. Long v. AnsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Parker v. ReddickTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Glaze v. GlazeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Boyd v. BellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1945
  4. Severn v. Adidas SportschuhfabrikenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Eberlin v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API