State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. Carolene Products
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtTipton, J.
This is an original proceeding in quo warranto brought by the Attorney General of this State to prohibit the respondent, a Michigan corporation, from doing ■ business in this State, charging that it was violating Sections 12408, 12409, 12411, 12413 and 12415, Revised Statutes of Missouri, 1929. These statutes were referred to in the briefs and the oral arguments of this case as the “filled milk” statutes. To the respondent’s return the relator filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings.
Respondent’s products are sold in this State under the trade names of “New Vitamin A Carolene” and “New…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- State Upon the Information of Shartel v. Missouri Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Dysart v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Holder v. Elms Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Carolene Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Laughlin v. ForgraveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Wright v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- State v. Van HornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Marie v. Standard Steel WorksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.