Legal Opinion
Gargoyles, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 30, 1994No. 342-88CPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Judge.
This patent case comes before the court on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Plaintiffs, Gargoyles, Inc. (“Gargoyles”) and Pro-tec, Inc. (“Pro-tec”), brought suit in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498(a),1 seeking damages for the infringement of a design patent and a utility patent. After a five-day trial, this court found that defendant, acting through the United States Army (“Army”), had not infringed plaintiffs’ patents. The Federal Circuit affirmed this court’s judgment of noninfringement of the design patent and findings…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Pennwalt Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- The Standard Oil Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. American Cyanamid Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gargoyles, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Gargoyles, Inc., and Pro-Tec, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Boeing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Chemical Separation Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Agfa-Gevaert N.V.District Court, W.D. New York · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.