Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Donovan

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1894No. 15740PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from an order of tbe Superior Court of Santa Clara County refusing to appoint the appellant as administrator, and from an order appointing the respondent as administrator of the estate of Timothy Donovan, deceased. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Haynes, C.

Timothy Donovan died intestate in Santa Clara county in this state, leaving an estate in said county.

Appellant and respondent each applied for letters of administration, the latter being the public administrator of said county. John Donovan, a brother of the deceased, requested the appointment of appellant. This request was denied, upon the ground that John Donovan was not a bona fide resident of this state, and therefore not entitled to administer the estate, under section 1369 of the Code of Civil Procedure, nor competent to nominate another under section 1379 of the same code.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hanson v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. In re Estate of BedellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. In re the Estate of BeechCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re Estate of NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Guardianship of MosierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Harding v. HardingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Smilie v. SmilieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Goldy v. DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API