Smilie v. Smilie
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County refusing a change of venue. T. W. Harris, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Motion to change the place of trial from Alameda County to Sacramento County. The motion was based upon the demand and the affidavit of defendant, the ground of the motion being that, at the commencement of the action, defendant was and ever since has been a resident of Sacramento County.
The action is for divorce, the complaint alleging extreme cruelty, and was filed July 15, 1912.
The affidavit states: “That since the 28th day of June, 1912, said defendant, Florence Lucia Smilie, has resided in and intends to continue to reside in the county of Sacramento, state of California; that ever since…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Sheehan v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Bradley v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- In re the Estate of DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Marston v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gordon v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Burt v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Schreiber v. HookerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Modine v. ModineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Perry v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.