Legal Opinion

Goldy v. Duncan

California Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1898No. Sac. No. 379PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL' from an order of the Superior Court of Yolo County granting letters of administration to the public administrator, and refusing letters to the next of kin of a deceased person, and from an order denying a new trial. W. H. Grant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

BELCHER, C

Theodore E. Weed died intestate in the county of Yolo, in this state, on the twenty-sixth day of March, 1896, being at that time a resident of said county, and leaving-an estate therein, consisting of real and personal property, of the value of about twenty thousand dollars. He left no wife or children and no next of kin residing in this state, unless the appellant, Mary L. Goldy, was so residing.

On April 2, 1896, H. C. Duncan, the public administrator of the county, duly filed a petition praying that letters of administration upon the said estate be issued to him, and thereafter,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bullis v. StanifordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. FieldsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
  3. Quinn v. NevillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. Fialkoff v. NevilNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Estate of El WardaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API