Legal Opinion
Karlen v. Janklow
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 26, 1983No. 14034PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSHEIM, Chief Justice.
This appeal is from a writ prohibiting the Governor from conducting a hearing pursuant to SDCL 3-17-3 concerning the removal of appellee police officers Kent Karlen, Richard J. Ackerson, and Thomas Schmitt from the Aberdeen, South Dakota Police Department. * We affirm.
Appellees are police officers of the City of Aberdeen and are governed by the Aberdeen Civil Service Ordinance. Revised Ordinances of Aberdeen No. 1567, §§ 21-43 through 21 — 85. SDCL 9 — 14—15 provides that policemen appointed under a civil service ordinance may be removed only pursuant to the provisions…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re the Appeal of the Sales Tax Refund Applications of Black Hills Power & Light Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Hot Springs Independent School District No. 10 v. Fall River Landowners Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. MyottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Matter of Ackerson, Karlen & SchmittSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HoxengSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Meyerink v. Northwestern Public Service Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Whalen v. WhalenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Faircloth v. Raven Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Brown v. Egan Consolidated School District 50-2South Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re the Change of Bed Category of Tieszen Memorial Home, Inc., MarionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.