Legal Opinion

Cowles v. Board of Regents of the University

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1943PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, P. J.

This is a review under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act of a determination made by the Board of Regents, which was transferred to this court by the Albany Special Term (Foster, J.). The Regents decided that petitioner was guilty of fraud and-deceit in the practice of medicine through aiding the Body and Mind Foundation, a corporation, to practice medicine, and by aiding one Rudolph Rebold, not licensed to practice as a physician “ to hold himself out as a licensed physician and to use the title 1 M. D.’ ”. Rebold’s alleged practice was in connection with the work of the Foundation.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Constant v. University of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. People v. Mangan, Churchill, FriedlanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. People v. HorvattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  5. Matter of Kasha v. Board of Regents of the UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lanier v. TrammellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  2. Matter of Tompkins v. Board of RegentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Small v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.New York Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Taylor v. HeisingerNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Sherman v. Board of RegentsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API