Legal Opinion

Matter of Tompkins v. Board of Regents

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 19, 1949PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBromley, J.

This appeal presents the question as to whether a doctor who prescribes narcotic drugs for an addict, with the sole purpose of satisfying the addiction and without a legitimate medical end, is thereby guilty of “ fraud or deceit in the practice of medicine ” (Education Law, § 6514, subd. 2, par. [a]) and subject to discipline by the Board of Regents.

After a proceeding pursuant to section 6515 of the Education Law the board had determined that respondent was guilty of “ fraud or deceit” under the statute and ordered the suspension of his license for six months. In reversing that determination…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matter of Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. BolandNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Linder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Webb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Eaton, Cole Burnham Co. v. . AveryNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. Bell v. Board of Regents of the UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Claim of Kopec v. Buffalo Brake Beam-Acme Steel & Malleable Iron WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. MATTER OF BARSKY v. Bd. of RegentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Nehorayoff v. MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Wassermann v. Board of Regents of UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Van Heukelom v. Nevada State Board Chiropractic ExaminersNevada Supreme Court · 1950

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API