Matter of Tompkins v. Board of Regents
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBromley, J.
This appeal presents the question as to whether a doctor who prescribes narcotic drugs for an addict, with the sole purpose of satisfying the addiction and without a legitimate medical end, is thereby guilty of “ fraud or deceit in the practice of medicine ” (Education Law, § 6514, subd. 2, par. [a]) and subject to discipline by the Board of Regents.
After a proceeding pursuant to section 6515 of the Education Law the board had determined that respondent was guilty of “ fraud or deceit” under the statute and ordered the suspension of his license for six months. In reversing that determination…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Matter of Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. BolandNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Linder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Webb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Eaton, Cole Burnham Co. v. . AveryNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Bell v. Board of Regents of the UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Claim of Kopec v. Buffalo Brake Beam-Acme Steel & Malleable Iron WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- MATTER OF BARSKY v. Bd. of RegentsNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Nehorayoff v. MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Wassermann v. Board of Regents of UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Van Heukelom v. Nevada State Board Chiropractic ExaminersNevada Supreme Court · 1950
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.