Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Heisinger
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 17, 1963PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHenry Tasker, J.
The issues of law and fact in this action for damages by plaintiffs purchasers against defendants vendors for fraud and deceit were tried before the court without a jury.
Plaintiff Terrence S. Taylor asserts that prior to the execution of the agreement of sale on August 7, 1961, he and his wife inspected the dwelling of defendants accompanied by a representative of Ark Associates, Inc., a real estate broker. On that date, inquiry was said to have been made of defendants concerning the existence of termites on the premises, and defend*956ants are alleged to have stated that there were no termites…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Bridger v. . GoldsmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Sylvester v. BernsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Sylvester v. BernsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Cowles v. Board of Regents of the UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Layman v. BinnsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Weintraub v. KrobatschSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Frank Borowicz v. Chicago Mastic Company, Frank Borowicz v. Chicago Adhesive Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- Galgani v. FlemingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Copland v. NathanielNew York Supreme Court · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.