Legal Opinion

Simper v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1999No. 23480PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUBSTITUTE OPINION THE COURT’S PRIOR OPINION DATED FEBRUARY 25, 1998, IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN.

TROUT, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment motion granted in favor of respondent Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company of Idaho (Farm Bureau) in an action for breach of contract and bad faith. We affirm the district court’s decision.

I

BACKGROUND

On November 3, 1994, Teena D. Simper (Simper) was injured in an automobile accident. At the time of the accident, Simper was insured under an automobile insurance policy issued by Farm Bureau. The other vehicle was insured by State Farm. While…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. White v. Unigard Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Friel v. Boise City Housing AuthorityIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  4. City of Chubbuck v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Mutual of Enumclaw v. BoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lovey v. Régence BlueShield of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Robinson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Mortensen v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. McGilvray v. Farmers New World Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Strong v. Unumprovident Corp.District Court, D. Idaho · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API