Legal Opinion

Erb v. Hawks

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1948No. 5065PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICE, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff (appellee), a real estate broker, recovered a judgment against defendant (appellant) for $2325.00 for services (as it is alleged) in securing a purchaser for defendant’s ranch.

It is admitted by the answer and found as facts by the trial court that plaintiff was a real estate broker doing business in Las Vegas, New Mexico; that he was employed by defendant on the 10th day of January 1945 to procure a purchaser for defendant’s ranch; and that defendant agreed to pay plaintiff five percent of the selling price of the ranch as commission if he succeeded in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Holton v. ShepardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Sessions v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. Williams v. EnglerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Valdez v. SalazarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  5. City of Roswell v. HallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rutledge v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Lindsey v. CranfillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Village of Cloudcroft v. PittmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Hudgens v. CarawayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Proctor v. MooreNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API