Legal Opinion

Valdez v. Salazar

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1940No. 4536PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKLEY, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff sued to recover damages for breach of contract to pay commission on' the sale by plaintiff of real and personal property belonging to defendants. Defendants denied making the contract and claimed to have made the sale themselves and to their own customer. The case was tried by the District Judge without a jury. The trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff.

The assignments of error are all addressed to the proposition that the findings of fact and conclusions of law are “contrary to the weight of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davidson v. EnfieldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Sanchez v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Edwards v. CockburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. Reed-Smith v. LockridgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. In Re Jubala's EstateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Van Orman v. NelsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Luna v. FloresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Williams v. EnglerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Baker v. Shufflebarger & Associates, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API