Legal Opinion

Hudgens v. Caraway

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1951No. 5370PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COORS, Justice.

Both sides question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain decisive findings against each. Defendants-appellants claim the court should have found plaintiffs were authorized to sell only one-half section of defendants’ land and, although an entire section was sold, that plaintiffs were not the procuring cause of the sale of the land or any part thereof. Plaintiffs claim the court should have found they were authorized to sell the entire section and that the plaintiffs were the procuring cause of the sale and entitled to a commission on the entire section sold. The court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Holton v. ShepardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Flippo v. MartinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Cumberland Savings & Trust Co. v. McGriffSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  4. Minks v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  5. Thornton v. ForbesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Frederick May & Company v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Lindsey v. CranfillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API