Legal Opinion

Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Yamhill County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 26, 1997No. LUBA 96-191; CA A98723PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

The Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) seeks review of LUBA’s decision affirming Yamhill County’s approval of a so-called “lot of record dwelling” in an exclusive farm use (EFU) zone. We affirm.

Donald and Sarah Duncan acquired the property in question in 1973. In 1996, their son Robert Duncan (Duncan) bought the property from them and applied to the county for permission to site a dwelling on it pursuant to ORS 215.705 and corresponding local legislation. ORS 215.705 provides, as relevant:

“(1) A governing body of a county or its designate may allow the establishment of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Steele v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Fechtig v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Craven v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bruggere v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API