Legal Opinion

Fechtig v. City of Albany

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 17, 1997No. LUBA 95-256; CA A97764PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Respondent Fechtig appealed to LUBA from the City of Albany’s approval of petitioner Drushella’s applications for a planned development, a 38-lot single family subdivision and related permits. LUBA affirmed the city’s decision. 31 Or LUBA 410 (1996). Thereafter, Drushella petitioned for attorney fees pursuant to ORS 197.830(14)(b). Drushella seeks our review of LUBA’s denial of that petition. Two questions are presented: whether there was any merit to (or “probable cause” for) any of Fechtig’s arguments in his appeal to LUBA; and, if so, whether an award of attorney fees under ORS…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Steele v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cantua v. CreagerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Department of Labor v. BerlantiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  3. Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Fechtig v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Windlinx Ranch Trust v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API