Legal Opinion

Bruggere v. Clackamas County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 28, 2000No. 99-091; CA A109338Published

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Petitioner Veenker seeks review of LUBA’s decision reversing Clackamas County’s approval of his application for a “lot-of-record” dwelling on his property, tax lot 400, located in an exclusive farm use (EFU) zone. We affirm.

ORS 215.705, the so-called “lot-of-record” statute, provides, in part:

“(1) A governing body of a county or its designate may allow the establishment of a single-family dwelling on a lot or parcel located within a farm or forest zone as set forth in this section and ORS 215.710, 215.720, 215.740 and 215.750 after notifying the county assessor that the governing body intends…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lane County v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Brentmar v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Craven v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API