Legal Opinion
Bruggere v. Clackamas County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 28, 2000No. 99-091; CA A109338Published
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
Petitioner Veenker seeks review of LUBA’s decision reversing Clackamas County’s approval of his application for a “lot-of-record” dwelling on his property, tax lot 400, located in an exclusive farm use (EFU) zone. We affirm.
ORS 215.705, the so-called “lot-of-record” statute, provides, in part:
“(1) A governing body of a county or its designate may allow the establishment of a single-family dwelling on a lot or parcel located within a farm or forest zone as set forth in this section and ORS 215.710, 215.720, 215.740 and 215.750 after notifying the county assessor that the governing body intends…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lane County v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Brentmar v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Department of Land Conservation & Development v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Craven v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995