Legal Opinion
Meadowbrook-Richman, Inc. v. Associated Financial Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 27, 2003No. 98 CIV. 5300(JGK)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KOELTL, District Judge.
This is a breach of contract action arising under New York law brought by the plaintiff Meadowbrook-Richman, Inc. (“MRI”) against various entities including Associated Financial Corp. (“AFC”), Wil-shire Investment Corp. (“Wilshire”), United Housing Preservation Corporation (“United Housing”), Westport Housing Corporation (‘Westport Housing”), and against two individual defendants, A. Bruce Rozet (“Rozet”) and Deane Earl Ross (“Ross”), (collectively “the defendants”) to recover damages for the failure to pay for various insurance related services…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Meadowbrook-Richman, Inc. v. Associated Financial Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Prestige Brands Inc. v. Guardian Drug Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Paragon Insurance Holdings, LLC v. Allied World Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Polar International Brokerage Corp. v. RichmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Poulin v. Boston Scientific CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.