Legal Opinion

Polar International Brokerage Corp. v. Richman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 14, 2006Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard J. Fried, J.), entered December 13, 2004, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendants-appellants’ motion to dismiss the first amended complaint as against them, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants-appellants dismissing the first amended complaint as against them.

In 1989, plaintiff Polar International Brokerage Corp. (Polar) and defendant Meadowbrook-Richman, Inc. (MRI), two firms engaged in insurance brokerage and claims adjustment, entered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Two Guys v. S.F.R. Realty AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Meadowbrook-Richman, Inc. v. Associated Financial Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  3. Meadowbrook-Richman, Inc. v. Associated Financial Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API