Gord v. F. S. Harmon & Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
— Thisaction was brought to recover the balance claimed to be due for wages. The plaintiff brought the action in his own behalf and upon approximately twenty-nine claims, similar to his own, which had been assigned to him for collection. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which it was concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to recover upon all the claims sued upon. From the judgment entered against the defendant in the sum of $3,697.47, it appeals.
The appellant, F. S. Harmon & Company, is a corporation, with its principal place of business…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dickie Manufacturing Co. v. Sound Construction & Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Cocalis v. NazlidesIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
- Sebree v. Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
- Martin v. VansantWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co. v. FryeWashington Supreme Court · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sapp v. BarenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Arbitration Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co. v. Lake Washington ShipyardsWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Greyhound Corp. v. Division 1384 of Amalgamated Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Hegeberg v. New England Fish Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.