Legal Opinion

Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. City & County of San Francisco

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 7, 1985No. C 84-6899 TEHPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge.

This case comes before the court on the cross-motions of plaintiffs, defendant, and defendant-intervenors, for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties having fully briefed the issues, the matter was submitted without oral argument on June 3, 1985. After careful consideration of the parties’ papers, and the entire record herein, the Court determines that there is no genuine dispute over a material issue of fact, and that defendant and defendant-in-tervenors are entitled to judgment as a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Fullilove v. KlutznickSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Exxon Corp. v. EagertonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Associated General Contractors Of California, Inc. v. City And County Of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Thomas P. Carney, Inc. v. School District of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. S.J. Groves & Sons Co. v. Fulton CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API