Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Ted Stevens Honda, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 10, 1987No. H001189PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*533Opinion

AGLIANO, P. J.

I

Introduction

Plaintiff William Palmer brought this action against Ted Stevens Honda, Inc. and others1 to recover proceeds of $29,500 and punitive damages from the sale of his car on consignment. On October 30, 1982, he delivered his Ferrari on an oral consignment for sale to Donald Alvord, an employee of defendant. The car was not sold by a Stevens dealership, but was reconsigned to Ferrari of Los Gatos (FLG) and sold by FLG in late December 1982 or early January 1983. The proceeds were comingled with FLG’s other assets when FLG filed for bankruptcy. On January 26, 1983,…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Brandt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Kruse v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Baldasarre v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  4. Knotts v. Zurich Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad v. AcuitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API