Legal Opinion

Fosnaugh v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1932No. 23588. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The plaintiff, a civil service employe of the defendant city, brought this action for the amount which he would have earned during the time that he was wrongfully laid off from work. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which the court concluded that a recovery could be had. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $2,475.75, from which the defendant appeals.

The facts essential to be stated are these: The appellant is a municipal corporation of the first class, and owns and operates a street railway. For some time prior to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. WickershamSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Reising v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Bringgold v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Foster v. HindleyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. State Ex Rel. Allen v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Watkins v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State Ex Rel. Buchanan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Haga v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State Ex Rel. Jackson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API