Legal Opinion

Foster v. Hindley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1913No. 10989PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered June 28, 1912, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to recover an office and salary.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

This action was brought to secure the restoration of the plaintiff to the office of sanitary inspector in the health department of the city of Spokane, and to recover the salary incident to the office during the period of separation. The mayor and the city have appealed from a judgment protecting the plaintiff in each of these alleged rights.

The findings, in substance, are as follows: The respondent was appointed sanitary inspector in the health department of the city in the month of June, 1909, and continued until he was removed by the mayor on the 31st day of May, 1911. The city adopted a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. WickershamSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. State ex rel. Powell v. FassettWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Powell v. BullisIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Reising v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Bringgold v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. State ex rel. Roe v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Washington Security Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State ex rel. Gilmur v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. State ex rel. Wettrick v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API