Legal Opinion
Kirzenbaum v. Paulus
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 11, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
51 N.J. Super. 186 (1958)
144 A.2d 25
GABRIEL KIRZENBAUM, LAWRENCE J. MEYERS AND WILLIAM MARMORSTEIN, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CHESTER W. PAULUS, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, HERBERT J. DAILEY, LUKE J. HORVATH, FELIX N. CANTORE AND JAMES A. McGARRY, BEING THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, N.J., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided July 11, 1958.
Mr. Gabriel Kirzenbaum, attorney for the plaintiffs.
Mr. Frederick F. Richardson, attorney for the defendants.
VOGEL, J.S.C.
The factual situation in this case projecting the legal issue involved arises out of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kozesnik v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Brandon v. Board of Commissioners of MontclairSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
- Monmouth Lumber Co. v. Township of OceanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Collins v. Board of Adjustment of Margate CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Fred v. Mayor and Council, Old Tappan BoroughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Riddlestorffer v. City of RahwayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Kirzenbaum v. PaulusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Yellow Cab Corp. v. City Coun., PassaicNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Silco Auto. Vending Co. v. PumaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- Good Deal of Ivy Hill, Inc. v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959