Legal Opinion
Kirzenbaum v. Paulus
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 12, 1959PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
57 N.J. Super. 80 (1959)
153 A.2d 847
GABRIEL KIRZENBAUM, LAWRENCE J. MEYERS AND WILLIAM MARMORSTEIN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
CHESTER W. PAULUS, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, HERBERT J. DAILEY, LUKE J. HORVATH, FELIX N. CANTORE AND JAMES A. McGARRY, BEING THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, N.J., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 25, 1959.
Decided August 12, 1959.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and HANEMAN.
Mr. Gabriel Kirzenbaum argued the cause as attorney pro se and for plaintiffs-appellants (Mr. Perry J. Martin on the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ward v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Wilentz v. HendricksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
- Wilentz v. HendricksonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Fred v. Mayor and Council, Old Tappan BoroughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Hoey v. . GilroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- LaRue v. TP. OF EAST BRUNSWICKNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Riddlestorffer v. City of RahwayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- State v. ReyesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- News Printing Co. v. TOTOWA BOR.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Silco Auto. Vending Co. v. PumaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.